Y'all might want to listen to Deanna Spingola toy with these two devious juwes trying to steer Sweden's pretend-patriotic movement. This is what happens when kikes come unstuck
As a Teacher of children with severe special needs, working predominantly within the asian community, I am very pleased to see this issue being publicly raised. Along with the distress the child may suffer throughout it's life as the result of a first cousin marriages, society has a huge financial burden to bare in providing the necessary support. These include a huge range of medical interventions, paediatric care, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, specialist teaching support, respite care, transportation, building adaptations etc, etc etc.If deviant sexual behaviour amongst the retarded but otherwise functioning young men from such relationships is now costing us to maintain some 250 of them in prison for the next fifteen years or so it may just be a cost too far. Should we now give serious consideration to banning such relationships in the UK, as many parts of the US has done, to lessen the incidence of these benighted imbeciles in our society?
“And if it’s scatological, all the better. For a Jew, a bowel movement is an event,” Waldoks declared.
“That’s why there’s so much bathroom humor.”(1)
“Jews have a fine tradition of scatological humor.” and “When new [Jewish] moms get together they love talking about poop,”(2)In a weird article about toilet training, Jewess Carla Naumburg proudly states:
“We talk about poop a lot in my family. You might think it’s just because we’re the parents of a toddler and an infant, and that’s definitely part of it. But we’re also Jews, so it comes naturally to us.”(3)
France’s National Assembly voted on Thursday to strike out the word “race” in any existing legislation that governs the country, even as members of the main opposition Union for Popular Movement labelled the move as overly idealistic.
“In eliminating the legal category of race, the Assembly has helped our country move forward on ideological and educational levels,” said the text’s author, MP Francois Asensi, a member of the far-left Left Front coalition that sponsored the bill.
The bill’s supporters argued that the term, which appears at least six times in France’s penal code and other legal texts, could be interpreted as a category of people.
“The word 'race' has no scientific validity and it has been the basis for racist ideologies,” the preamble to the bill declared.
Under the new law, France will not recognise the existence of any distinct race or races.
Justice Minister Christiane Taubira, who as an MP in 2001 authored a law defining slavery as a crime against humanity, said she applauded the bill’s adoption.
Remains in constitution
Members of the ruling Socialist Party had rallied behind the measure, claiming it was a first step in a larger reform to delete “race” from France’s constitution.
President François Hollande’s winning platform in the 2012 elections included a measure to omit the word from France’s most important legal document.
The term “race” appears just once in the French constitution. “[France] guarantees the equality of all citizens before the law, regardless of their origin, race or religion,” it states.
However, Hollande’s idea seems destined to fall flat, as a change in the constitution requires a difficult to clear three-fifths majority in both the National Assembly and the upper-house Senate.
Opponents of the bill approved on Thursday decried that the ban would create a legal void between the constitution and legislation. They also pointed out that it did nothing to diminish racism or hate crimes.
“You can not change reality by simply changing the words... you're wasting a lot of time and energy on illusions,” argued Lionel Tardy, an MP with the opposition UMP party, who voted against the change.
“My focus is now on moving forward.”Who cares about HER moving forward? What about those abused girls who can never move forward and who, no matter how much therapy they have, will forever be lost souls unable to trust or forge a loving relationship?
“We now understand more about the grooming process,” she says.Well, bully for her. Pity she hadn’t “understood” sooner... especially as it was happening right under her nose.
‘Marriage appears more than 3,000 times in law, affecting every aspect of our lives. It is simply impossible to redefine it without many serious unintended consequences, not least forcing schools to teach children about gay marriage, even if this goes against the wishes of the parents, children and teachers.’
‘The issue of same-sex marriage is not just one about equality, but what happens in our school classrooms as well,’ he said.
‘Teachers should be able to exercise their consciences according to their own views on marriage, but that could well be constrained by these proposals.
‘As much as I am sceptical about the Government being able to exempt churches from conducting same-sex marriages, I also doubt whether it will be possible to construct exemptions for teachers.
‘They would be open to legal challenges. Is the Government really going to order primary school teachers to go against the views of the churches that run them?’Hundreds of Canadians have faced legal proceedings for opposing same-sex ‘marriage’ in the public sphere following its introduction in 2005, it has been reported. Within five years of marriage being redefined in Canada, an estimated two to three hundred cases have been brought against individuals, mostly Christians, who have opposed same-sex marriage in the public sphere. The proceedings have been brought at employment boards, courts, and human rights commissions.